In the context of triennial review, which parties must agree that the evaluation is not warranted?

• A. The student and the principal
• B. The guardian and the education agency
• C. The teacher and the guardian
• D. The school board and the parent

Answer: (B)

During a triennial review, the team considers whether a new evaluation is needed to determine continued eligibility for special education. If they conclude that no reevaluation is warranted, that decision must be agreed upon by the guardian (the student's parent or legal guardian) and the education agency (the school district). This mutual agreement ensures both the family and the district are aligned on the plan and keeps the parent informed with the required notice about why no new assessment will be conducted and what rights remain.

Other individuals (like a principal, teacher, or the school board) may be involved in discussions, but the official determination that an evaluation is not warranted rests with agreement between the guardian and the education agency.